PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.24%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-16.08%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 10842.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
138.16%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
126.00%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.09%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
172.09%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.04%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.75%
Interest expense growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.69%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.69%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 14.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.27%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 14.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
17.40%
Operating income growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 34.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.41%
Operating margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 34.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
46.46%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.51%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 28.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
32.39%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 28.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
42.50%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 31.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
38.46%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 28.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
31.39%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 28.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
50.60%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 28.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.60%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 28.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.06%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.06%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.