PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.68%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.09%
Cost growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.93%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.23%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.23%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.41%
Total costs growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.25%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.76%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.53%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 15.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.00%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.02%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2.34%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
13.71%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.