PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.70%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.02%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-52.50%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 666.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-49.63%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 643.41% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.39%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 318100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-43.39%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 4508.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.58%
Total costs growth less than half of UPM.HE's 9.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 156.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.88%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.76%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.44%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.12%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.60%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.09%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.