PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.08%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.47%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 341.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
120.47%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
102.11%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.80%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
103.80%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.32%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.12%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.68%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.00%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 37.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.84%
Similar operating income growth to UPM.HE's 28.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
16.27%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 31.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-5.26%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 48.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.34%
Similar pre-tax income growth to UPM.HE's 36.40%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
19.49%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 39.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
51.06%
Tax expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 121.43%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
28.03%
Similar net income growth to UPM.HE's 26.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
17.37%
Net margin growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 29.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
25.00%
Similar EPS growth to UPM.HE's 26.09%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
25.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to UPM.HE's 26.09%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.58%
Share count reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.58%
Diluted share change of 0.58% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.