5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.07%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.71%
Cost growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.70%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 47.62%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
6.70%
Operating expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 47.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.75%
Total costs growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 5.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.84%
Interest expense change of 7.84% while UPM.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-1.58%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.91%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
27.50%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 14.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-21.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.08%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 9.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.06%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.