5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.53%
Cost growth less than half of UPM.HE's 304.61%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
16.80%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.82%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.16%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.28%
Total costs growth less than half of UPM.HE's 14.50%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 14.29%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
39.41%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.83%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.63%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.49%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-114.23%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 30.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.68%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.41%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.91%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.73%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.63%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.43%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.23%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.23%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.