5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.14%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 5.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.97%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 1.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-11.95%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 25.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.18%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 18.59% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.34%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.04%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.97%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 60.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.92%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 52.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.15%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 85.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 75.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.08%
Other expenses change of 23.08% while UPM.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-3.41%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 87.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 76.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-20.86%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 10.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.59%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 104.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.91%
Net margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 92.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.35%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 104.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 104.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.70%
Share count change of 0.70% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.84%
Diluted share change of 1.84% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.