PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.62%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.55%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 399.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.88%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.26%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.31%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.31%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.79%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
49.70%
D&A growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 82.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-12.48%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.29%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.52%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.50%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-101.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
223.68%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.