PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.40%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-35.41%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.27%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.42%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 70.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.73%
Total costs growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 2.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
175.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 9.52%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-20.06%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 2.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-36.44%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.39%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-64.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.70%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-168.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.65%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.13%
Share count change of 0.13% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.13%
Diluted share change of 0.13% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.