PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.31%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-15.76%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.58%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
34.48%
Interest expense growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-39.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.98%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-471.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-496.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.43%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 12.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-260.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-276.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-210.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-223.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.33%
Share count increase while UPM.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.33%
Diluted share increase while UPM.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.