PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 4.81%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 2.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-327.01%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.25%
Total costs growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.13%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.97%
D&A growth while VALMT.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-44.21%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.29%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-148.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-148.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-400.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-157.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-157.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.42%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.