PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.94%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 4.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.97%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 5.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-51.13%
Gross profit decline while VALMT.HE shows 2.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-42.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28500.00%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
95.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 16.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.44%
Total costs growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.13%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.22%
D&A growth while VALMT.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-829.17%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-957.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1553.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1844.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.25%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-693.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-832.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-625.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-533.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-644.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-472.73%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-472.73%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.58%
Share count reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.58%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.