PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-24.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
127.85%
Positive growth while VALMT.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
141.76%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x VALMT.HE's 2.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.52%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.52%
Operating expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
116.67%
Interest expense growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.40%
D&A reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.05%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.57%
EBITDA margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.75%
Operating margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.38%
Other expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 60.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.48%
Tax expense growth while VALMT.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.92%
Share count change of 1.92% while VALMT.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.92%
Diluted share increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.