5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.05%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 31.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.72%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 35.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.86%
Gross profit decline while VALMT.HE shows 20.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.85%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.85%
Similar operating expenses growth to VALMT.HE's 17.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.41%
Total costs growth less than half of VALMT.HE's 31.42%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
D&A reduction while VALMT.HE shows 13.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.98%
EBITDA decline while VALMT.HE shows 24.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.47%
Operating income decline while VALMT.HE shows 30.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.29%
Pre-tax income decline while VALMT.HE shows 26.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.53%
Tax expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-39.09%
Net income decline while VALMT.HE shows 22.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.18%
EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 23.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Diluted EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 23.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.54%
Share count increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.54%
Diluted share increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.