5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.31%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-0.44%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -1.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-15.76%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 4.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.97%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 3.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.58%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
34.48%
Interest expense growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-39.50%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -7.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-57.98%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -6.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-56.09%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-471.05%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-496.74%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-31.43%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 11.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-260.27%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -6.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-276.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-62.50%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -20.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-210.00%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -9.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-223.95%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-200.00%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 23.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-200.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 21.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.33%
Share count change of 3.33% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
3.33%
Diluted share change of 3.33% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.