5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
10.71%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.93%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.00%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.73%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.70%
Other expenses change of 6.70% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
6.70%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.43%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
9.75%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.07%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
7.84%
Interest expense change of 7.84% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-1.58%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-19.91%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.80%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-22.32%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.27%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
27.50%
Other expenses change of 27.50% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-21.64%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 2.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.08%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-22.45%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.40%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-20.00%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.06%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.