PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.66%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.66%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.45%
Other expenses change of 99.45% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
150.73%
Operating expenses change of 150.73% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-5.79%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.16%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-44.22%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-43.85%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
194.23%
Income change of 194.23% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
194.86%
Margin change of 194.86% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-9.09%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
133.78%
Income change of 133.78% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
134.01%
Margin change of 134.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
142.86%
Tax expense change of 142.86% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
127.94%
Income change of 127.94% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
128.13%
Margin change of 128.13% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
128.57%
EPS change of 128.57% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
128.57%
Diluted EPS change of 128.57% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.