PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.65%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.65%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34500.00%
Other expenses change of 34500.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
8.29%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.91%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
8.29%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.00%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
158.06%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.06%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-37.66%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-35.30%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-169.57%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-172.20%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-40.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-270.97%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-277.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-310.71%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-318.70%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-312.50%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-312.50%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.