5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.32%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-3.07%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-7.80%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-3.64%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-25.40%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.51%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-12.79%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-51.72%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
4.48%
EBITDA change of 4.48% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
39.36%
Margin change of 39.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
86.36%
Income change of 86.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
94.78%
Margin change of 94.78% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1.41%
Other expenses change of 1.41% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
237.50%
Income change of 237.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
252.75%
Margin change of 252.75% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-550.00%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
400.00%
Income change of 400.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
422.59%
Margin change of 422.59% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
333.33%
EPS change of 333.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
333.33%
Diluted EPS change of 333.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
23.08%
Share count change of 23.08% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
23.08%
Diluted share change of 23.08% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.