5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.02%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-6.73%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-4.03%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
2.11%
Margin change of 2.11% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.09%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.09%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.23%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-67.62%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-10.53%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-11.07%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.38%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-16.95%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.64%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
71.10%
Other expenses change of 71.10% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
150.59%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
166.64%
Margin change of 166.64% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
640.00%
Tax expense change of 640.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
120.00%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.22%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
134.09%
Margin change of 134.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
200.00%
EPS change of 200.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
200.00%
Diluted EPS change of 200.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-26.67%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-26.67%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.