PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.60%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
14.08%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.79%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-59.67%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-57.73%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.81%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-59.81%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.46%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
72.03%
Interest expense change of 72.03% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
6.07%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.89%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
158.46%
EBITDA change of 158.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
56.19%
Margin change of 56.19% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
58.55%
Income change of 58.55% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
66.19%
Margin change of 66.19% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-12.62%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
111.11%
Income change of 111.11% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
121.29%
Margin change of 121.29% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-817.65%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
331.94%
Income change of 331.94% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
352.77%
Margin change of 352.77% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
332.00%
EPS change of 332.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
332.00%
Diluted EPS change of 332.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.