PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.70%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-1.18%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
0.46%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 2.31%. Jim Chanos would check for business deterioration.
1.17%
Margin change of 1.17% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.48%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-17.48%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.27%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
15.28%
Interest expense change of 15.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
0.38%
D&A growth 50-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 0.51%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine asset strategy.
17.56%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
42.22%
Margin change of 42.22% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
55.92%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.30%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
57.02%
Margin change of 57.02% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
15.60%
Other expenses change of 15.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
80.12%
Income change of 80.12% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
81.40%
Margin change of 81.40% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.79%
Tax expense change of 13.79% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
86.69%
Income change of 86.69% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
88.01%
Margin change of 88.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
66.67%
EPS change of 66.67% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
66.67%
Diluted EPS change of 66.67% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
12.01%
Share count change of 12.01% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
12.01%
Diluted share change of 12.01% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.