PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.92%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-4.52%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
0.85%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median of 1.56%. Guy Spier would scrutinize competitive position.
3.87%
Margin change of 3.87% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.19%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.64%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
9.23%
Interest expense change of 9.23% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
9.61%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.63%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
26.54%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.85%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
4.09%
Margin change of 4.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5.50%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
8.67%
Margin change of 8.67% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-80.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.94%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-41.03%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2.93%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.01%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.29%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
13.25%
Share count change of 13.25% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
13.25%
Diluted share change of 13.25% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.