PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.38%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-16.08%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.86%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
138.16%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
126.00%
Margin change of 126.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.09%
Other expenses change of 172.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
172.09%
Operating expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
2.04%
Total costs growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
18.75%
Interest expense change of 18.75% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
15.69%
D&A change of 15.69% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
27.69%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
20.27%
Margin change of 20.27% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
17.40%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
11.41%
Margin change of 11.41% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
46.46%
Other expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.78%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
39.51%
Income change of 39.51% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
32.39%
Margin change of 32.39% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
42.50%
Tax expense change of 42.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
38.46%
Income change of 38.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
31.39%
Margin change of 31.39% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.60%
EPS change of 50.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.60%
Diluted EPS change of 50.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-8.06%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-8.06%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.