PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.70%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
14.02%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.42%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-52.50%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-49.63%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.39%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-43.39%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.58%
Total costs growth 50-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 2.31%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.88%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-6.34%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.67%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.23%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.80%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
54.76%
Other expenses change of 54.76% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
6.85%
Income change of 6.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.31%
Margin change of 13.31% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
4.44%
Tax expense change of 4.44% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
7.12%
Income change of 7.12% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.60%
Margin change of 13.60% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.09%
EPS change of 9.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.09%
Diluted EPS change of 9.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.