PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.08%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-10.47%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
120.47%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
102.11%
Margin change of 102.11% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.80%
Other expenses change of 103.80% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
103.80%
Operating expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
3.32%
Total costs growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.12%
D&A change of 8.12% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-20.68%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
5.00%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
26.84%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
16.27%
Margin change of 16.27% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-5.26%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 14.71%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
30.34%
Income change of 30.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
19.49%
Margin change of 19.49% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
51.06%
Tax expense change of 51.06% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
28.03%
Income change of 28.03% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
17.37%
Margin change of 17.37% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
25.00%
EPS change of 25.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
25.00%
Diluted EPS change of 25.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.58%
Share count change of 0.58% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.58%
Diluted share change of 0.58% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.