PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 3.44%. Jim Chanos would check for market share loss risks.
0.67%
Cost growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive cost advantages.
-0.13%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.53%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.16%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.16%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.19%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
6.08%
EBITDA change of 6.08% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5.89%
Margin change of 5.89% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.20%
Income change of 3.20% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2.79%
Margin change of 2.79% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-22.73%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
5.85%
Income change of 5.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5.43%
Margin change of 5.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.91%
Tax expense change of 9.91% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
4.89%
Income change of 4.89% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
4.47%
Margin change of 4.47% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.69%
EPS change of 7.69% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.69%
Diluted EPS change of 7.69% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.60%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-2.60%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.