PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
13.78%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.33%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
7.65%
Growth of 7.65% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-3.68%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.28%
Other expenses change of 19.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
19.28%
Operating expenses change of 19.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
14.72%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.48%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-75.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.42%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.36%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
5.79%
EBITDA change of 5.79% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-11.01%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.91%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.34%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.16%
Other expenses change of 6.16% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
0.65%
Income change of 0.65% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-9.95%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
19.02%
Tax expense change of 19.02% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-3.88%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.01%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.23%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.23%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.24%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.