PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.85%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-0.18%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-16.31%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-12.96%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.69%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.57%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.44%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-33.33%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-29.13%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-22.22%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-47.26%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-89.49%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-89.07%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
155.00%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-84.36%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-83.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.00%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-76.26%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.31%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.43%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.43%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.28%
Share count change of 0.28% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.28%
Diluted share change of 0.28% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.