PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.77%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-15.88%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
4.85%
Growth of 4.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
18.84%
Margin expansion while Consumer Cyclical median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.34%
Other expenses change of 162.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
7.64%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.67%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-11.51%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-80.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
40.56%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.03%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
84.00%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
36.73%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-106.45%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-107.31%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
36.36%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-67.44%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -8.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-63.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -7.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.67%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-48.94%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-42.12%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.48%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.48%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.