5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.78
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.13
1.0–1.2 – On the edge. Philip Fisher might worry about unexpected shortfalls or partial reliance on inventory liquidation.
0.50
0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.
1.06
Below 2 – Weak. Howard Marks would fear that a downturn might jeopardize debt payments.
0.89
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.