Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)

5.560.02 (-0.36%)

Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE) stock comprehensive Liquidity Coverage Analysis including current ratio, quick ratio, cash ratio, interest coverage ratio, gross margin, operating margin, net margin, return on assets, return on equity, return on invested capital. Compare liquidity against peers/competitors, industry and sector standards.

Moderate Bankruptcy RiskFair ValuationLow ProfitabilityAdequate Financial HealthModerate EfficiencyWeak GrowthModerate QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 53.85%Sector Rank: 49.50%

HEL - Consumer Cyclical - Packaging & Containers | Market Cap: 1.25B | Next Earnings Date: 23 Oct 2025

Day's Range

5.56 - 5.56

52-Week Range

4.95 - 8.28

Volume

45 / 2.4K (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-278.00 | -0.02

Trending:

METSA.HE Liquidity & Coverage Analysis

Compare against a Competitor

None UPM.HE STERV.HE METSB.HE VALMT.HE HUH1V.HE

Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.

Current Ratio

1.87

Increased from previous period

1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.

Quick Ratio

1.23

Decreased from previous period

1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.

Cash Ratio

0.56

Decreased from previous period

0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.

Interest Coverage Ratio

8.10

Increased from previous period

5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.

Short-Term Coverage Ratio

0.61

Increased from previous period

Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.

+ Add New Metric (Coming Soon)

Add more metric or remove existing ones, customize as per your preference, feature coming soon!

Select Chart Metric:

METSA.HE Liquidity & Coverage Analysis

Compare against a Competitor

None UPM.HE STERV.HE METSB.HE VALMT.HE HUH1V.HE

Current Ratio

1.87

Increased from previous period

1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.

Quick Ratio

1.23

Decreased from previous period

1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.

Cash Ratio

0.56

Decreased from previous period

0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.

Interest Coverage Ratio

8.10

Increased from previous period

5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.

Short-Term Coverage Ratio

0.61

Increased from previous period

Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.

+ Add New Metric (Coming Soon)

Add more metric or remove existing ones, customize as per your preference, feature coming soon!

Select Chart Metric: