PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.82
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.24
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.
0.62
0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.
8.40
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
1.03
1.0–1.2 – Barely enough to cover short-term debt from OCF alone. Philip Fisher would question if expansions are prudent.