PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.09%
Negative net income growth while AI stands at 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.38%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.49%
Less working capital growth vs. AI's 615.91%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AI's 100.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
100.00%
Well above AI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
5.63%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AI's 151.15%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-6.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -159.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.08%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-45.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3064.96%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 85.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.02%
Issuance growth of 32.02% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
99.48%
Buyback growth of 99.48% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.