PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.38%
Negative net income growth while AI stands at 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.67%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
60.56%
Deferred tax of 60.56% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.45%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AI is 615.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-112.74%
Negative yoy usage while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-48.77%
Negative yoy while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-55.17%
Negative yoy CFO while AI is 151.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-72.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -159.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
98.97%
Acquisition growth of 98.97% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
27.28%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-34.10%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.08%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 85.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
73.23%
Buyback growth of 73.23% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.