PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.99%
Negative net income growth while AI stands at 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
161.11%
Some D&A expansion while AI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-529.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
11.98%
SBC growth while AI is negative at -9.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
319.74%
Well above AI's 615.91% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.60%
AR growth of 171.60% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.68%
Growth well above AI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-159.56%
Negative yoy while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
38.24%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AI's 151.15%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-15.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -159.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1000.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
17.71%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-69.05%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.84%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 85.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.47%
Negative yoy issuance while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-150.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.