PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.51%
Negative net income growth while AI stands at 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-23.38%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-259.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.24%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AI at -9.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
158.03%
Less working capital growth vs. AI's 615.91%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
148.31%
AR growth of 148.31% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.67%
Growth well above AI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
32.50%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AI's 100.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
104.53%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AI's 151.15%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
5.03%
Some CapEx rise while AI is negative at -159.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-31.75%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
37.58%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-57.10%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.55%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 85.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.12%
Buyback growth of 37.12% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.