PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x AI's 0.62%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-3.34%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
69.36%
Deferred tax of 69.36% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.54%
SBC growth while AI is negative at -9.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-89.91%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AI is 615.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
188.66%
AR growth of 188.66% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
16.13%
Inventory growth of 16.13% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-13233.33%
Negative yoy AP while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.26%
Negative yoy usage while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
96.19%
Well above AI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
46.22%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AI's 151.15%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
25.59%
Some CapEx rise while AI is negative at -159.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-396.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-77.70%
Negative yoy purchasing while AI stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
30.63%
We have some liquidation growth while AI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
148.40%
Growth of 148.40% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-20.34%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 85.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-26.79%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
112.45%
Issuance growth of 112.45% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-14.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.