PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x AI's 0.62%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.47%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
20.95%
Deferred tax of 20.95% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.73%
SBC growth while AI is negative at -9.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-204.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AI is 615.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.00%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
181.20%
Inventory growth of 181.20% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
154.00%
AP growth of 154.00% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-117.28%
Negative yoy usage while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
31.33%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AI's 100.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-48.91%
Negative yoy CFO while AI is 151.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
12.94%
Some CapEx rise while AI is negative at -159.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
90.51%
Acquisition growth of 90.51% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
20.51%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
61.57%
We have some liquidation growth while AI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-38.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.33%
Investing outflow well above AI's 85.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-22.85%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
272.88%
Issuance growth of 272.88% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-14.84%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.