PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x AI's 0.62%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
195.51%
Deferred tax of 195.51% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.66%
SBC growth while AI is negative at -9.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-0.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AI is 615.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
216.78%
AR growth of 216.78% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-456.68%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-156.79%
Negative yoy AP while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-67.74%
Negative yoy usage while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
10.90%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AI's 100.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
39.00%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AI's 151.15%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
31.38%
Some CapEx rise while AI is negative at -159.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
25.00%
Acquisition growth of 25.00% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
45.35%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-49.98%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-179.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
20.98%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AI's 85.39%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
25.71%
Debt repayment growth of 25.71% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
22.29%
Issuance growth of 22.29% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-109.98%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.