PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.09%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -8824.15%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.81%
D&A growth well above AI's 14.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.08%
Deferred tax of 85.08% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.18%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 19.45%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-298.63%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -138.59%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-141.66%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AI at -88.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
242.42%
Some inventory rise while AI is negative at -148.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
98.72%
A yoy AP increase while AI is negative at -86.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
79.10%
Some yoy usage while AI is negative at -596.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1945.45%
Negative yoy while AI is 9.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-22.71%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AI at -207.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-4.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -312.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
82.68%
Acquisition growth of 82.68% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
18.72%
Purchases growth of 18.72% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-34.80%
We reduce yoy sales while AI is 22.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-216.42%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 18.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-239.86%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 15.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.28%
Debt repayment growth of 99.28% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-5.99%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.