PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.70%
Negative net income growth while AI stands at 66.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.65%
Negative yoy D&A while AI is 5.70%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
206.68%
Deferred tax of 206.68% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.15%
Negative yoy SBC while AI is 12.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
135.21%
Slight usage while AI is negative at -29.87%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.20%
AR growth while AI is negative at -289.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-77.35%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 71.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
7900.00%
A yoy AP increase while AI is negative at -1634.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
104.88%
Growth well above AI's 55.90%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.62%
Some yoy increase while AI is negative at -35.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
63.90%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AI's 38.10%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-6.26%
Negative yoy CapEx while AI is 92.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-311.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.31%
Purchases growth of 16.31% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
20.83%
We have some liquidation growth while AI is negative at -25.89%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
272.00%
We have some outflow growth while AI is negative at -99.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.84%
We have mild expansions while AI is negative at -952.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-16566.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
46.15%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AI's 200.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-35.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.