PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -210.68%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.38%
Less D&A growth vs. AI's 260.78%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-125.40%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.82%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 39.96%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
68.49%
Well above AI's 49.04% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-1149.94%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 87.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-238.67%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 319.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
454.21%
AP growth well above AI's 84.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
13958.21%
Some yoy usage while AI is negative at -105.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-251.92%
Both negative yoy, with AI at -7.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.68%
Some CFO growth while AI is negative at -40.14%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -430.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-401.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while AI stands at 88.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
9.95%
Below 50% of AI's 135.81%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-129.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 13481.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8849.02%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 109.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-0.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
17.96%
Buyback growth of 17.96% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.