PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.30%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -10062.67%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.39%
D&A growth well above AI's 4.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-54.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.55%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 109.72%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-566.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -24.07%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-145.32%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 191.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
197.52%
Some inventory rise while AI is negative at -93.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-89.52%
Negative yoy AP while AI is 2069.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
45.91%
Some yoy usage while AI is negative at -150.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-176.56%
Negative yoy while AI is 12.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-35.27%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AI at -89.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
14.94%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AI's 59.48%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
13.72%
Acquisition growth of 13.72% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-3.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -147.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
6.03%
We have some liquidation growth while AI is negative at -50.49%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
115.70%
We have some outflow growth while AI is negative at -150.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
68.93%
We have mild expansions while AI is negative at -151.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.59%
Negative yoy issuance while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
3.08%
Buyback growth of 3.08% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.