PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AI at -12.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.34%
D&A growth well above AI's 1.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-417.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.62%
Negative yoy SBC while AI is 26.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
139.11%
Slight usage while AI is negative at -269.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
107.24%
AR growth while AI is negative at -89.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-141.75%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AI at -25545.71%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
2424.24%
AP growth well above AI's 28.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
151.29%
Growth well above AI's 30.21%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
0.85%
Some yoy increase while AI is negative at -5.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
77.21%
Some CFO growth while AI is negative at -1490.30%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-21.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while AI is 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1710.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-21.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -13.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
18.13%
Below 50% of AI's 116.46%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
22.32%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AI's 136.92%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-480.23%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 135.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
84.62%
Debt repayment growth of 84.62% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
31.13%
Issuance growth of 31.13% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-6.04%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.