PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.48%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -42.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.90%
D&A growth well above AI's 1.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.36%
Deferred tax of 61.36% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.02%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 13.37%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-33.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -4.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-4102.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AI at -1288.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-17.93%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 116.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
94.12%
A yoy AP increase while AI is negative at -99.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
538.20%
Growth well above AI's 214.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-18.52%
Both negative yoy, with AI at -1.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.39%
Some CFO growth while AI is negative at -28.63%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-26.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -87.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.33%
Acquisition growth of 93.33% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.04%
Some yoy expansion while AI is negative at -784.84%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-49.54%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -10.82%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
8.50%
We have some outflow growth while AI is negative at -6062.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-12.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -6176.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
13.64%
We slightly raise equity while AI is negative at -198.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-3.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.