PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.59%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -55.75%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-3.95%
Negative yoy D&A while AI is 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-17458.82%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.34%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 86.24%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
205.26%
Well above AI's 237.68% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
190.35%
AR growth well above AI's 129.43%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AI at -264.86%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-129.13%
Both negative yoy AP, with AI at -69000.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-131.10%
Negative yoy usage while AI is 5.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
12.50%
Some yoy increase while AI is negative at -102.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
8.06%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AI's 103.22%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
9.95%
Some CapEx rise while AI is negative at -118.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-140.72%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
30.71%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AI's 89.57%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
37.46%
Below 50% of AI's 137.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-196.08%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 99.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
70.05%
Investing outflow well above AI's 118.64%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AI's 100.60%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-7.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.