PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.49%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AI at -51.47%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.84%
D&A growth well above AI's 7.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
103.07%
Deferred tax of 103.07% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
11.46%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 133.90%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-275.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -85.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-152.86%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 176.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
150.71%
Inventory growth well above AI's 89.63%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
149.89%
AP growth well above AI's 118.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-22.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -243.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
15.66%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AI's 3322.22%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-40.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AI at -1949.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-0.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while AI is 9.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
29.52%
Some acquisitions while AI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
75.70%
Some yoy expansion while AI is negative at -205.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-43.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -14.59%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
78.66%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AI's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
64.28%
We have mild expansions while AI is negative at -153.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-52.45%
Negative yoy issuance while AI is 25.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
3.27%
Buyback growth of 3.27% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.