PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.86%
Negative net income growth while AI stands at 30.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.92%
D&A growth well above AI's 14.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-208.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.47%
SBC growth while AI is negative at -3.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
132.15%
Slight usage while AI is negative at -1552.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
115.46%
AR growth while AI is negative at -243.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-170.81%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.28%
Lower AP growth vs. AI's 917.92%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
142.54%
Growth well above AI's 45.82%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
134.20%
Well above AI's 255.52%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
75.32%
Some CFO growth while AI is negative at -193.28%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.95%
CapEx growth well above AI's 17.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-2102.24%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-248.22%
Negative yoy purchasing while AI stands at 48.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
118.36%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AI's 11.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-1226.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 16948.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1292.85%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 204.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.92%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AI's 210.59%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-18.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.