PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.07%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -48.10%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.46%
D&A growth well above AI's 2.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
242.93%
Deferred tax of 242.93% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.77%
Less SBC growth vs. AI's 13.61%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-52.05%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AI is 109.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1574.21%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 70.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-65.23%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
411.35%
AP growth well above AI's 722.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
485.36%
Some yoy usage while AI is negative at -9.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
13722.86%
Well above AI's 53.35%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while AI is 76.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -113.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.25%
Acquisition growth of 93.25% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
43.61%
Some yoy expansion while AI is negative at -69.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-74.92%
We reduce yoy sales while AI is 77.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.64%
We have some outflow growth while AI is negative at -100.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.84%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AI's 91.36%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -92.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
0.74%
Buyback growth of 0.74% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.